TO ALL THE OFFICERS OF THE COURT WHO HAVE COMMITTED FRAUD ON THE COURT

“Write on my gravestone: ” Traitor.” — traitor to every government that oppresses the people.” — Wendell Phillips
If you can live up to the line carved on that gravestone, you should be proud of being called a traitor committing treason. Otherwise, shame on you!

Chen specifically charges David Roberts, Roberts Roberts Odefey Witte LLP and Judge Sipper Koetter with giving and taking $1,850.10 in violation of, inter alia, 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(1)(A), which prohibits giving “anything of value” to a present, past, or future public official “for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such public official.”

“To oppose corruption in government is the highest obligation of patriotism.” ― G. Edward Griffin

Cole Cole & Easley, McManus & Crane LLP, Cullen Carsner Seerden & Cullen LLP, Robert Hewitt, Roberts Roberts & Odefey LLP, Macklin Johnson, Benjamin Heilker, Schwartz & Schwartz, Emmett Cole, Howard Marek, R W Briggs, Nancy Sanders, John C Thompson, William Sciba, Rex Easley, Robert McKay, Carol A West, Brin and Brin P.C., Bernard Klimist, James Cole. Royston Rayzor Vickery & Williams L.L.P., Clifton Thomas, Rosemary Harrison, M K Marlow Company Ltd. LLP, Chuck L Cole, Rick Huegele, Larkin Thedford, Munson & Burns, Richard Cullen, Mark Marlow — Donations range from $1,000 to $7,000. How can you win if they appear before Judge Koetter against you?

The record shows that the minimum donation was $1,000 and the highest was $7,000 to be eligible to join the above CLUB OF WINNERS. Unless we win the jackpot, how can indigents like you and me outbid them?! Apparently, the balance of justice tips in favor of those who place higher stakes. They are a sure bet to win unless we have the rules changed!

The Code of Judicial Conduct CANON 4: Conducting the Judge’s Extra-Judicial Activities to Minimize the Risk of Conflict with Judicial Obligations

D. Financial Activities.
(4) Neither a judge nor a family member residing in the judge’s household shall accept a gift, bequest, favor, or loan from anyone except as follows:
(c) a judge or a family member residing in the judge’s household may accept any other gift, bequest, favor, or loan only if the donor is not a party or person whose interests have come or are likely to come before the judge;

Here, at least David Roberts and his law firm Roberts Roberts Odefey & Witte were parties or persons whose interests had come before the judge. The Texas judicial elections of 2010 consisted of a Primary Election on March 2, 2010 and a General Election on April 13, 2010. Judge Koetter ran unopposed. Therefore, any reasonable juror would think of the $1,850.10 as a reward or a bribe.

The other donors are subject to investigation, too, because most of the funds were donated between Sep/2010 and Sep/2012, at least five months after the election. Such donations cannot qualify for “appropriate campaign or officeholder expenses as permitted by state law.” See CANON 4 D. (1).

If these donors had been your opponents or opposing counsel, they could have committed fraud on the court with Judge Koetter. Consequently, any Order or Judgment against you was VOID ab initio for violating CANON 4 D. (1).

Never underestimate the effectiveness of a straight cash bribe. — Claud Cockburn

Though the bribe be small, yet the fault is great. — Edward Coke

I have often noticed that a bribe has that effect – it changes a relation. The man who offers a bribe gives away a little of his own importance; the bribe once accepted, he becomes the inferior, like a man who has paid for a woman. — Graham Greene

LET’S TAKE A CLOSE LOOK AT THE CONTRIBUTIONS BETWEEN 9/2010 AND 9/2012

* Juergen “Skipper” Koetter’s reelection ran unopposed in the March 2, 2010 Primary Election and the April 13, 2010 General Election.
* Why should the lawyers and law firms give him large sums of money long after the election?
* If the donors are parties or persons whose interests have come or are likely to come before Judge Koetter, what will such funds be, rewards or bribes?
* David Roberts came before him on July 15, 2012 and obtained a judgment in favor of him as well as his co-conspirators, and donated $1,850.10 to him sometime in August, 2010. If the $1,850.10 donation is not reward or bribe, what is it?
* Do you make campaign contributions to Obama or Romney after Nov. 6, 2012 or before?

To Judge Kemper Stephen Williams, Judge Skipper Koetter, Clerk Pamela Martin Hartgrove, Judge John D. Rainey, Judge Janis Graham Jack, David Roberts, Richard T. Chapman, Thomas George, Kenneth Burch, Richard Morrison, Randal W. Hill, et al.:

You are all urged to read the related posts published here. They are either extracted from the federal or state court docket or ready to be filed in due course.

Please try to see if your judicial conscience is shocked the moment the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth is revealed to you. You all take an oath to abide by the law and uphold the Constitution of the United States. By violating the Supreme law of the land, you are guilty of treason. You all know that, don’t you? If not, read Abuse and Misuse of Judicial Power, Trespassing, Usurpation, Conspiracy, Corruption, and Treason Posted on September 26, 2012, An Open Letter to Judges John D. Rainey and Janis Graham Jack charging them with abuse and misuse of judicial power, trespassing, usurpation, conspiracy, corruption, and treason! Posted on June 8, 2012, and the other related posts for a better understanding of what crimes you have committed in conspiracy with the other conspirators, particularly Anita L. Koop, Terry J. Cox, Anita’s Resort Properties Inc., John Gerken, Lennar Partners and their aiders and abetters.

For the past ten years, I have been deprived of the opportunity to have a meaningful full and fair hearing in either the federal or state court. However, none of you can stop me from accessing the court for redress of grievances — my First Amendment right guaranteed by the United States Constitution. I vow to have you properly punished and your imitators deterred by fighting against your miscarriage of justice.

Govern yourselves lawfully since you are in the administration of justice,

Paul Chen

P.S. The common nouns of abuse and misuse of judicial power, trespassing, usurpation, conspiracy, corruption, and treason are abuser and misuser of judicial power, trespasser, usurper, conspirator, corrupter, and traitor. Check the list to see if you fit into the picture. And when I named you as one of the RICO persons in the RICO claims, you became one of the racketeers. Why have you remained completely silent? Why don’t you take me to the court to have your friends prosecute, persecute, and charge me with libel for publishing false and defamatory statements concerning you?

Note: ABET — “To encourage or incite another to commit a crime. This word is usually applied to aiding in the commission of a crime. To abet another to commit a murder is to command, procure, counsel, encourage, induce, or assist. To facilitate the commission of a crime, promote its accomplishment, or help in advancing or bringing it about.
In relation to charge of aiding and abetting, term includes knowledge of the perpetrator’s wrongful purpose, and encouragement, promotion or counsel of another in the commission of the criminal offense.” See West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2.

TO TOP LITIGATORS: BESIDES EARNING A MULTI-MILLION-DOLLAR FEE, YOU CAN HELP COUNTLESS INDIGENT LITIGANTS IF YOU ARE COURAGEOUS ENOUGH TO HAVE THE RICH AND POWERFUL WRONGDOERS PUNISHED AND DETERRED IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE!

Posted on October 31, 2012

Dear Litigators of Excellence:

If you are not located in Southern Texas or Southeast Florida and have no conflict of interest, you are urged to take the opportunity of turning youselves into champions of the needy, the indigent, and the oppressed in representing the pro se/indigent litigants to have justice served because after deducting the multi-million-dollar attorneys’ fees, all the accrued pre-judgment interest of my pecuniary losses of $34,999,640.91 and punitive damages shall be donated to charities specializing in pro bono services.

All my past ten years of intensive and extensive legal research products are posted here for your reference. They are either filed in the federal/state courts or to be filed in due course.

The court records of 93-21204-V-11, 96-24925-V-7, V-06-78, V-09-11 (Chen v. Cox), V-10-56 (Chen v. Rainey) may also be downloaded from Pacer.

I can provide you with any brief you may require for presentation in the courtroom to address the jury. You need not spend much time doing any legal research in that I have spent 15 hours per day for the past ten years on the various issues related to my causes of action. I know them inside out. I just need your expertise in litigation because I have never faced any jury panel before.

Your assistance in having miscarriage of justice or manifest injustice corrected is urgently requested and greatly appreciated.

If you have any questions, e-mail me, please.

Very truly yours,

Paul Chen

E-mail Addresses:
ricofraudonthecourt@yahoo.com
pc886405@yahoo.com

P.S.

The National Enquirer’s article was published on October 9, 1979, the Court of Appeals of California rendered a judgment on December 15, 1982, the U.S. Supreme Court argued the case on November 8, 1983 and decided on March 20, 1984. Therefore, the libelous effect on Ms. Jones was short-lived and not permanent. On the other hand, the mental anguish, emotional stress, loss of reputation, destruction of marriage, and disruption of my family life have been going on for more than 20 years since Hurricane Andrew damaged my two office buildings in Miami, resulting in Lennar’s insurance fraud and its counsel’s subsequent fraud on the federal and state courts. Thus, a reader pointed out that if Ms. Jones could claim $20 million for defamation, I should be entitled to at least $40 million for the 20 years of pain and suffering in addition to the monetary losses of $34,999,640.91 + 18% compound interest allowed by Texas law.

As for my claim of a minimum of 1:9 for Punitive Damages, it should be compared with the TXO’s jury verdict of $19,000 in actual damages and $10 million in punitive damages which was 1:526. Besides, the misconduct of Lennar, its counsel and the other Defendants was far more reprehensible and destructive than that of TXO Production Corp. Therefore, it is suggested that the jury should have its final decision on the total amount of punitive damages in my various causes of action. In addition, RICO claim is allowed the statutory triple damages.

* I have finally found my standing to sue both Lennar Corporation and LNR Property LLC in either Texas or Florida based on the following essential information: “Lennar Corporation builds homes in 18 different states, including Texas and Florida. LNR has been responsible for the successful development, redevelopment and repositioning of over 1,000 properties in 33 states during the last 15 years. From 1969 through October 1997, LNR operated as the commercial arm of Lennar Corporation (NYSE: LEN). In 1997, LNR (also formerly known as Lennar Partners) spun off from Lennar Corporation as a separate public company (NYSE:LNR), focused exclusively on commercial real estate investment and development. Today LNR is a private company maintaining the name of LNR Property LLC.”

TO BE CONTINUED.

* We all know that attacking one’s enemies anonymously is despicable. In our society, as well as in the court of law, hiring a hit man to do the dirty job does not relieve one of liability for compensatory and punitive damages.

That’s why I have chosen to use my real name instead of writing under a pseudonym because I have nothing to hide!

This entry was posted in ABUSE AND MISUSE OF POWER, CIVIL CONSPIRACY CLAIMS, FRAUD ON THE COURT, Plead Common-law Fraud with Particularity, RECUSAL MOTION, RICO CLAIMS, Selective Prosecution, Suing officers of the court, VOID ORDERS/JUDGMENTS and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to TO ALL THE OFFICERS OF THE COURT WHO HAVE COMMITTED FRAUD ON THE COURT

  1. After reading this I would like to communicate with you because you care about justice. I too have stumbled into the court room as a pro se litigant and have written many documents and motions. I have from the beginning believed that there is a conspiracy between the lawyer and the judge and court system. I have written to complain about the treatment only to be completely ignored and my rights infringed upon. I don’t know how I am still litigating this case for myself., but I am still in court. I am being rapidly shot down and will soon experience death by summary judgment. I too have spent upwards of 10 plus hours in a day on my days off trying to figure out how to make my next move. Most of the time by the time I figure out what I am supposed to do and laboriously put together a document the time limit is up and now I can;t submit the new information. Justice is not at the heart of the court system. Part of my problem is that the law firm that I am running against is the largest law firm in the state of Iowa. Now just how would it look if the headline in the newspaper read, “The law firm of NYEMASTER GOOGE P.C., the largest in the state of Iowa lost a case of employment discrimination to a pro se litigant?” Well we know that isn’t going to happen. This law firm carries a lot of clout and is definitely not concerned about the constitutional rights of the American Citizen nor the rights of the Iowa citizen. This is the very same law firm that took money from the Mitt Romney campaign to remove Libertarian candidate for President, Gov. Gary Johnson, from appearing on the Iowa ballot in November. The Romney campaign hired the Des Moines-based Nyemaster Goode PC for the challenge, which will be heard by Iowa Secretary of State Matt Schultz on Monday at 3 p.m. (this info taken from the Ron Paul Forums)So here is a law firm that is more concerned about padding their pockets than they are about protecting the constitutional rights of Iowa Citizens! So, again I ask, “how can I win against odds like that?” Currently I have applied for accommodations respecting my disabilities and the upcoming deposition. Despite the fact that I presented documents to the courts proving that I am disabled, the court concluded that I am not entitled to accommodation. I am exhausted from researching when all I have at my disposal is a very slow computer connection and Goggle. Even after I find case law or codes, it is not easy to apply them to my case. Then because of my inexperience, lack of education , legal mentoring, and no clue on how to write a document that will be accepted by the court, I manage after many hours and even days put together a document to submit to the court. The court then does not timely respond and in some cases not respond at all. The lawyers for the defense have been in contempt of a discovery order issued by the court in June of 2011. I have issued motions to compel\l to no avail. When I complained, I was threatened with consequences of dismissal if I continued with this uncivil behavior. Stating a fact is uncivil behavior?! I want very much to know how to fight and to be able to somehow have a publlic forum where these injustices can be viewed by the public and perhaps how to write a petition to legislature to change the insane pro se laws. I even wrote to Justice Sonia Sotomayer about the problem and did not even get a response stating that they received my letter let alone whether or not they will address this problem at some point. Well there is lots more but if you would be able to speak with me on any of these matters and how to make this injustice public, that would be great. It isn’t just my case which I know the coourt won’t let me win but it is also for may others who have come before me and were legally abused and victimized and others who will come after me. I really enjoyed your posts. Thank you for standing up for justice.Louetta Finch P.O. Box 234 Hiawatha, Iowa 52233; 319-363-2278

    • Hi, Louetta,

      Internet malfunction completely wiped out my response to you!

      Please read my “David Roberts, Richard T. Chapman & Judge Skipper Koetter: Thanks for your constant support by keeping Numero Uno position. I’ll pay more attention to you after Olympus is taken care of!” Posted on December 28, 2012, and send your related court papers to both e-mail addresses to avoid delivery problems.

      I would be happy to help you with all the info I have accumulated over the last ten years.

      Believe that justice will eventually prevail! I do!

      Paul

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s